<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JUDGING A BOOK BY ITS COVER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedesignfarm.com/blog/2008/03/13/judging-a-book-by-its-cover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedesignfarm.com/blog/2008/03/13/judging-a-book-by-its-cover/</link>
	<description>The Fourth Wall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Raymond</title>
		<link>http://www.thedesignfarm.com/blog/2008/03/13/judging-a-book-by-its-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedesignfarm.com/blog/2008/03/13/judging-a-book-by-its-cover/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d vote for a or b, because these two have visuals that serve a purpose--conveying the perplexing nature of Foreign Policy, through the question mark or the ball of string. The others, while having nice contrast and type, seem to be more strictly stylizations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d vote for a or b, because these two have visuals that serve a purpose&#8211;conveying the perplexing nature of Foreign Policy, through the question mark or the ball of string. The others, while having nice contrast and type, seem to be more strictly stylizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
